🤼 Musk vs. Trump: Clash of Titans!

CEO battles to sweeping travel bans and corporate shakeups

In partnership with

Suit & Times Daily Briefing – Jun 6, 2025

Find out why 1M+ professionals read Superhuman AI daily.

In 2 years you will be working for AI

Or an AI will be working for you

Here's how you can future-proof yourself:

  1. Join the Superhuman AI newsletter – read by 1M+ people at top companies

  2. Master AI tools, tutorials, and news in just 3 minutes a day

  3. Become 10X more productive using AI

Join 1,000,000+ pros at companies like Google, Meta, and Amazon that are using AI to get ahead.

šŸ”¹ Top Stories at a Glance

  • 🤼 Trump and Musk’s ā€œCrazyā€ Feud Erupts on Social Media: Personal barbs fly as Trump calls Musk ungrateful over the mega-bill and Musk fires back, accusing Trump of hypocrisy.

  • āœˆļø Trump Reinstates U.S. Travel Ban, Bars Citizens of 12 Countries: A new proclamation effective June 9 bars entry for nationals of a dozen countries to address ā€œforeign terroristā€ risks.

  • āš™ļø Procter & Gamble Unveils Ambitious Restructuring Plan to Cut Up to 7,000 Jobs: P&G will reduce its non-manufacturing workforce by 15% over two years to streamline operations and bolster efficiency.

  • šŸ“‰ Lululemon Cuts Full-Year Guidance, Shares Plunge 20% Despite Q1 Beat: The athleisure retailer beat earnings expectations but slashed its EPS forecast, sending its stock tumbling.

  • šŸ“‰ U.S. Suspends Price Checks in Lincoln and Provo Amid Staffing Shortages: The BLS halts CPI data collection in two cities due to federal hiring freezes, raising concerns over inflation accuracy.

šŸ“ˆ The Ledger

Tracking key market indexes to give you a pulse on global financial movements. 

As of close June 5, 2025

These indexes cover U.S. markets, global equities, small-cap stocks, volatility, and economic trends, offering a snapshot of where the market is heading.

šŸ”¹ Why These Indexes Matter:

  • Broad Market Trends: The S&P 500, Dow Jones, and Nasdaq show how major U.S. companies are performing.

  • Volatility & Risk: The VIX measures market uncertainty and investor sentiment.

  • Global Perspective: FTSE 100, Nikkei 225, and MSCI World reflect international market health.

🤼 Trump and Musk’s ā€œCrazyā€ Feud Erupts on Social Media

The Story: A long‐running friendship between former President Donald Trump and Elon Musk turned sour on Thursday as both men took to social media to trade barbs over Trump’s sweeping domestic megabill. Trump lamented Musk’s ā€œingratitudeā€ after Musk publicly criticized the legislation’s $3 trillion price tag, while Musk reminded Trump of his $270 million campaign backing—escalating tensions that have now spilled into a very public showdown.

By the numbers:
šŸŽÆ $270 million — Amount Musk spent supporting Trump and other Republicans during the 2024 cycle.
šŸ“Š $3 trillion — Estimated deficit impact over a decade for the ā€œOne Big Beautiful Bill Act,ā€ per the nonpartisan budget office.
šŸ—³ļø 1 vote — Margin by which the House passed Trump’s megabill last month.
⚔ 2 days — Time between Musk’s first public jab at the bill and Trump’s Oval Office response.

Why it matters:
šŸ”Œ Electric vehicle angle — Trump rescinded Musk’s EV mandate; Musk argues the bill guts future EV tax credits.
šŸ›ļø Policy vs. personal — The feud highlights how personal relationships collide with policy priorities in Washington.
šŸ¤ GOP unity tested — Republican lawmakers must now navigate internal divisions as Musk’s criticisms resonate with fiscally minded conservatives.
šŸ“± Social media showdown — Their public spat underscores how platforms like X (formerly Twitter) have become battlegrounds for political influence.

šŸ”— Read the full story → ABC News

āœˆļø Trump Reinstates U.S. Travel Ban, Bars Citizens of 12 Countries

The Story: President Donald Trump signed a proclamation on June 4, 2025, reviving a travel ban that will fully bar citizens from twelve countries from entering the United States, effective June 9. Trump framed the order as essential to protect against ā€œforeign terrorists and other security threats,ā€ pointing to recent incidents—such as a gasoline-bomb attack in Boulder, Colorado—as justification. Visas issued before June 9 remain valid, but no new entries from the twelve fully banned nations will be permitted. Seven additional countries face partial restrictions. International reactions ranged from outright condemnation (Chad halted U.S. visa issuances in response) to cautious cooperation (Somalia pledged to work with the U.S. on security concerns). The policy echoes Trump’s 2017 travel restrictions on seven Muslim-majority countries—later repealed by President Biden—and marks another aggressive step in his second-term immigration crackdown.

By the numbers:
šŸ›‚ 12 countries fully barred: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen.
🚫 7 countries partially restricted: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, Venezuela.
šŸ“… June 9, 2025 @ 12:01 a.m. EDT – Ban takes effect; existing visas remain valid.
šŸ’µ $113 million+ spent by Trump administration on related immigration enforcement this year.
šŸ’¬ ā€œWe will not allow people to enter … who wish to do us harm,ā€ Trump said in a video posted on X.

Why it matters:
šŸ”’ National security focus — Trump frames the ban as essential to vet and screen potential threats (ā€œforeign terrorists … other security threatsā€).
šŸŒ Global backlash — African Union warns of harm to educational, commercial, diplomatic ties; Chad halts U.S. visa issuances in retaliation.
šŸ¤ Diplomatic strain — Congo Republic labels its inclusion a ā€œmisunderstanding,ā€ while Somalia pledges cooperation to address concerns.
šŸ« Human impact — A 31-year-old Myanmar teacher fears losing her exchange‐program placement; thousands of Afghans in Pakistan face new uncertainty.
šŸ”„ Policy continuity — Mirrors Trump’s 2017 travel ban on Muslim-majority nations; Biden had repealed those curbs in 2021.

šŸ”— Read the full report → Reuters

āš™ļø Procter & Gamble Unveils Ambitious Restructuring Plan to Cut Up to 7,000 Jobs

The Story: Procter & Gamble (P&G) on Thursday announced a sweeping two-year restructuring that will eliminate up to 7,000 non-manufacturing positions—about 15% of that workforce—in an effort to streamline its organization, refine its product portfolio, and bolster supply chain efficiency. Facing muted consumer demand driven partly by global uncertainties (including U.S. tariffs), the consumer goods giant is accelerating existing strategic initiatives rather than responding to a single external shock. Executives emphasized that roles will be broadened, teams reduced, and digitalization and automation harnessed to make work more efficient and fulfilling. As part of this overhaul, P&G will reevaluate underperforming categories and consider divesting certain brands to drive faster innovation, cost savings, and supply chain benefits. Despite near-term challenges—geopolitical unpredictability, fierce competition, and rapidly evolving technology—P&G believes disciplined execution of its integrated growth strategy, focused on meeting underserved consumer needs and expanding into new segments, will unlock long-term opportunities. The company anticipates restructuring charges of $1–$1.6 billion before tax over two years, with roughly one-quarter of those charges non-cash. As of June 2024, P&G employed around 108,000 people; these cuts will primarily affect non-manufacturing roles.

Key Takeaways:
šŸ”§ Organizational Overhaul: P&G will reduce up to 7,000 non-manufacturing jobs over two years to create broader roles, smaller teams, and more efficient operations.
šŸ“¦ Portfolio Optimization: The company plans to exit or divest underperforming categories, brands, and products in certain markets to foster faster innovation and cost reduction.
🚚 Supply Chain Efficiencies: By narrowing its product lineup, P&G aims to drive supply chain savings and accelerate time to market.
🌐 Market Pressures: Imperfect consumer demand—exacerbated by tariff uncertainty—alongside intense competition and rapid technological shifts are key drivers of this restructuring.
šŸš€ Growth Focus: P&G believes disciplined resource allocation and pursuing underserved segments will create new growth opportunities despite near-term headwinds.
šŸ’° Financial Impact: The restructuring will incur $1–$1.6 billion in charges (pre-tax) over two years, with about 25% non-cash, as the company streamlines operations.

šŸ”— Read the full story → FOX Business

šŸ“‰ Lululemon Cuts Full-Year Guidance, Shares Plunge 20% Despite Q1 Beat

The Story: Lululemon reported fiscal first-quarter earnings that surpassed Wall Street expectations, but its announcement of lowered full-year earnings guidance sent the stock tumbling about 20% in after-hours trading. The company cited a ā€œdynamic macroenvironment,ā€ including tariff pressures and slowing U.S. consumer demand, as reasons for trimming its outlook.

Key Takeaways:
šŸ“ Q1 Results: Earnings per share of $2.60 beat expectations of $2.58, and revenue of $2.37 billion beat estimates of $2.36 billion.
šŸ”» Guidance Cut: Full-year earnings per share forecast reduced to $14.58–$14.78 from $14.95–$15.15; analysts had expected $14.89.
šŸ’² Revenue Outlook Unchanged: Second-quarter revenue guidance of $2.54–$2.56 billion and full-year revenue of $11.15–$11.30 billion remain in line with prior forecasts.
šŸ“‰ Q2 EPS Forecast: Anticipated at $2.85–$2.90 per share versus Street’s $3.29 estimate, reflecting ongoing margin pressure.
šŸ“Š Comparable Sales: Rose just 1% year-over-year in Q1 (versus a 3% Street expectation), with a 2% decline in the Americas offset by a 6% international gain.
šŸ› ļø Tariff Impact: Like many retailers, Lululemon faces higher costs from President Trump’s tariff regime; peers such as Abercrombie & Fitch and Gap have already trimmed or cut guidance.
šŸ­ Manufacturing Profile: In 2024, 40% of Lululemon’s goods were made in Vietnam, with remaining production spread across Cambodia, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Bangladesh, and other regions, emphasizing supply-chain vulnerability to tariffs.

šŸ”— Read the full story → CNBC

šŸ“‰ U.S. Suspends Price Checks in Lincoln and Provo Amid Staffing Shortages

The Story: Federal staffing cuts have forced the Labor Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) to scale back its monthly price surveys, leading to a suspension of data collection in Lincoln, Neb., and Provo, Utah, and a pause in Buffalo, N.Y. While officials expect minimal impact on the national Consumer Price Index (CPI), economists warn regional accuracy and specific item data could suffer.

What’s Happening:
šŸ—“ļø Monthly Price Surveys: Hundreds of BLS employees normally track prices of goods and services across U.S. cities each month to calculate the CPI.
🚫 Suspended Cities: Data collection was halted in Lincoln and Provo in April and paused in Buffalo this month due to insufficient staffing.
šŸ›‘ Reduced Coverage: With fewer price-checkers, the BLS is making ā€œeducated guessesā€ for missing prices, using costs of similar items where possible.

Why It Matters:
āš ļø Inflation Monitoring: CPI figures guide Federal Reserve decisions on interest rates and inform cost-of-living adjustments for programs like Social Security.
šŸ“Š Risk of Inaccuracy: Economists caution that any gap in price data can introduce volatility—particularly in regional cost-of-living reports or in prices for specific products.
ā“ Timing Concern: The cutbacks come as analysts seek signs that tariffs might rekindle inflation, making precise CPI figures more crucial than ever.

Underlying Factors:
šŸ‘„ Federal Hiring Freeze: Since early 2017, a freeze on federal hiring has trimmed the workforce by at least 26,000, straining agencies like the BLS.
šŸ’° Budget Constraints: Ongoing efforts to cut agency funding exacerbate staffing shortages, forcing data collection reductions.

Expert Warnings:
šŸ“‰ Quality at Risk: ā€œThis is the worst possible time to make staffing cuts to the CPI,ā€ warns economist Ernie Tedeschi of Yale’s Budget Lab, noting that errors could skew inflation readings in either direction.
šŸ” Data Integrity: Omair Sharif of Inflation Insights emphasizes that degrading CPI statistics could worsen economic outcomes for households and policy-makers alike.
āš–ļø Broader Impact: Incomplete or imputed price data may undermine confidence in measures that affect everyday borrowing costs and government benefit adjustments.

šŸ”— Read the full story → NPR

Reach 3,500+ Industry Leaders & Decision-Makers

Our audience includes executives, investors, and professionals across business, finance, and technology—engaged readers who influence industries and drive decisions. Put your brand in front of the right people.

šŸ“© Contact [email protected] to explore sponsorship and partnership opportunities.

Start Your Shopify Store for Just $1/Month

As a valued Suit & Times subscriber, you’re getting exclusive access to this Shopify deal—a free 3-day trial, then just $1/month for your first 3 months. If you’ve been thinking about launching an online store, now’s the time.

šŸ’” That’s it for today’s briefing. Stay sharp, stay informed, and we’ll see you tomorrow!